PRAC Review Cycles

  • 99 new protocols evaluated from July 2012 to July 2014 (26 imposed): Overal 150 protocols reviewedENCePP
  • After one year of meetings, average of 15 protocols evaluated per month
  • Median 2 rounds of review for imposed, and 1 round for non imposed

Imposed/ Mandated PASS

  • 26 protocols (7 protocols with no info available)
  • 58% were rejected due to an inadequate proposed study design to meet the study objectives
  • 42% (n=8) were endorsed at the first round of review pending further clarifications on a list of questions

Non-Impossed/ Voluntary PASS

  • 73 protocols (9 protocols with no info available)
    70% (n = 45) were endorsed at the first round of review pending further clarifications on list of questions
  • 30% had revision due to
    • Sample size
    • Statistical analyses
    • Missing timelines
    • Enrolment strategy
    • Representativeness
    • Bias and confounding
    • Observational nature of the study an inadequate proposed study design to meet the study objectives

 The EU PASS Register

  • 35% of imposed and 23% of non imposed studies are registered
  • Overall one out three PASS are registered with an slightly higher proportion for imposed as compared to non imposed

[Read more…]